Constructive QFT
Rigorous renormalisation, multiscale analysis, continuum limits, and nonperturbative field construction.
Independent scrutiny invited
Expert reviewers are invited to challenge the proof.
Unconditional proof claimed in Volumes I–III. Independent expert review ongoing. The project is seeking specialists willing to test the manuscript at full depth or review a well-defined part of its dependency chain.
What is being asked
Criticism, not endorsement. A useful review should say exactly where the argument succeeds, where it fails, and what would be needed to repair it.
Relevant expertise
Reconstruction
Osterwalder–Schrader theory, Wightman axioms, operator algebras, and Hamiltonian reconstruction.
Gauge theory
Wilson lattice gauge theory, compact Lie groups, global forms, gauge geometry, and continuum identification.
Spectrum and verification
Spectral theory, mass-gap arguments, exact computation, source auditing, and formal verification in Lean.
Ways to contribute
A review can be comprehensive or sharply bounded.
Full referee review
Read the manuscript end to end and report on correctness, completeness, and publishability.
Specialist module
Examine one load-bearing part of the dependency chain within your area of expertise.
Adversarial review
Try to break the argument: identify hidden assumptions, circularity, unjustified limits, or counterexamples.
Verification audit
Reproduce a supporting calculation, source dependency, or selected formalised implication.
Review package
Enough structure to inspect the work efficiently.
The public reviewer package now includes:
- Volume I — The All-Group Theorem and Finite-Prefix Wilson Renormalization
- Volume II — Global Forms, Asymptotic Freedom, and Dimensional Transmutation
- Volume III — Reconstruction, Mass Gap, and Yang–Mills Identification
- Canonical proof-route manifest
- Expert-review talk and guide package
- A map of the proof’s main dependencies
- Technical supplements and reproducibility material
- Focused questions for specialist review
- The project’s response and revision record
Release YM-I-III-R1 · 21 August 2026 · source snapshot c89fa4157.
AI-assisted mathematics
Review the proof, not the model.
GPT‑5 performed much of the mathematical development. That makes independent scrutiny more important, not less. Reviewers need not evaluate GPT‑5 as a system; they are asked to evaluate the written definitions, lemmas, dependencies, calculations, and conclusions by ordinary mathematical standards.
Read the full disclosureRequest private access
Interested in reviewing?
Email the research director with your area of expertise and the kind of review you would consider. You can request a full-manuscript review or one bounded module; the release identifier above makes the target version explicit.
contact@yangmills.net